menu

CLUE(DO) or CLUE(LESS) – Company approaches to Modern Slavery Statements


Colleen Theron

BY: Colleen Theron / 27th Mar

Heard of the game of Cluedo? It’s a board game about deduction where players try to figure out the three main facts of a murder: the location of the murder, the murderer, and the murder weapon.

So now you are wondering how the game of Clue relates to the question of publishing a statement under the Modern Slavery Act (MSA)… Let’s gather some evidence!

Set up

According to the Global Slavery Index there are roughly 45.8 million slaves in the world today. Whist not all slavery involves murder, it is not absent. And in fact, if its loss of a potential life well lived, that in itself is arguably a death penalty. So we have a victim. Or more than one. With these numbers of slaves we know that the majority of global companies cannot claim to have slavery free supply chains.

Taking steps

According to the rules of Cluedo, players have to determine the location of the murder and the murder weapon. According to the MSA, companies have to publish a statement setting out what steps they are going to take to identify modern slavery in their supply chains. This insinuates knowing more about the location of potential crime scenes. Those companies that have disclosed the identity of the risks in their supply chain are well on track to gathering evidence.

The Clue(less) are simply not looking or finding the evidence too hard to gather – that’s the conclusion one can draw from the number of statements that have been identified as not being legally compliant. We have researched 20 statements of companies based in West Sussex and found over 70% to be legally not compliant. This is a higher figure than the findings in the Ergon report. There does not seem to be any sense of deduction in these statements that slavery is an actual risk or even seen as a potential risk, with a sense that these issues can be tackled later on. As we know, all board games (whether Cluedo, Snakes and Ladders or Monopoly) have winners and losers. Will the Clue(less) only take steps once their board sees the impact to their reputation or in rising litigation suits?

Suggestions

To help solve the mystery of who committed the crime, players are able to make suggestions. Clue(dos) provide helpful information in their statements setting out how they propose to tackle the risk of modern slavery with reference to their organisational structure, risk management processes and due diligence procedures. The Clue(less) simply gloss over any suggestion of how they might move beyond compliance with reference to the statement being made in accordance with section 54 of the Act.

Deduction

Cluedo is about deduction. This is true of what is required to address slavery in supply chains. Those companies that are serious about tackling slavery in their supply chains are seeking to map their suppliers and once this has been done, deduce how they will work with those that are seen to pose the highest risk. The Clue(less) merely make simplistic statements like ‘we do not tolerate any child labour in our supply chains’ with no evidence that there are processes in place, or being developed to support this statement or indeed follow industry best practice. A failure to deduce the risk of creating a statement that is not underpinned by a strategy creating a roadmap towards best practice is likely to lead to being eliminated from the game. Players can stay at the table, but only to disapprove the suggestions of others.

Spending time in your rooms

It has not been suggested that tackling the issue of slavery in supply chains is going to be easy or something that will happen overnight. In the game of Cluedo figuring out the rooms is the hardest part of the game. To do this players are encouraged to learn more about the weapons and the people in their own rooms. It goes without saying that in relation to modern slavery risk the CLUe(less ) don’t know entirely what is going on in their own rooms (i.e business and supply chains) and have not spent time understanding the what ‘weapons’ are effective. Those companies that have started working on identifying their risks and building their due diligence programmes are the CluedUP ones. Unlike the Clue(Less) they will have started mapping how their products or services impact on human rights, identifying the locations of risk and deducting how they can ensure that their ‘weapons’ of due diligence and up to date policies will reduce the risk of victims of trafficking in their business and supply chains

Copius notes?

Cluedo experts provide 4 key tips on how to tackle the game. These tips are useful for the Clue(less) to help them tackle how to improve their board strategy in the next round of MSA statements:

  • Before ‘playing’ ask yourself how much work you want to do and if you have the internal resources to tackle the task.
  • Know what information to give away– its about knowing how to manage your disclosure in such a way that your stakeholders find it credible without putting the company at risk of misrepresentation.
  • Use your knowledge about other player hands to make new deductions – if you have benchmarked your policies and procedures against your competitors, there may be pre-competitive advantage to working more closely together to solve the issue.
  • Figure out what your opponents know – collaboration and benchmarking will be what shapes the success in tackling slavery issues in the future.

    Read all of Colleen Therons Insights


Colleen Theron

Hire this consultant


Related Posts